Question · asked by 1 review

Pilocarpine vs placebo: Salivary flow rate

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Pilocarpine hydrochloride (parasympathomimetic) vs Placebo
Salivary flow rates · Patients with radiation-induced salivary gland dysfunction
Parasympathomimetic drugs for the treatment of salivary gland dysfunction due to radiotherapy (2015) · Cochrane All outcomes
Only two studies measured salivary flow rates (Johnson 1993; LeVeque 1993); no usable summary/pooled data reported.2 studiesGRADE not reported
Pilocarpine hydrochloride (parasympathomimetic) vs Placebo
Salivary flow rates · Patients with radiation-induced salivary gland dysfunction
Parasympathomimetic drugs for the treatment of salivary gland dysfunction due to radiotherapy (2007) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD003782.PUB2, superseded
Only two studies measured salivary flow rates (Johnson 1993; LeVeque 1993); no usable summary/pooled data reported.2 studiesGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Parasympathomimetic drugs for the treatment of salivary gland dysfunction due to radiotherapy
2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
2015-07list not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.