Question · asked by 1 review

IMMEDIATE initiation of cART vs DEFERRED initiation of cART: Death

Population
HIV‐positive, treatment‐naive children aged one to 12 years old
Intervention
IMMEDIATE initiation of cART
Comparison
DEFERRED initiation of cART
Outcome
Death

It is very uncertain whether IMMEDIATE initiation of cART changes death compared with DEFERRED initiation of cART (very low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
IMMEDIATE initiation of cART vs DEFERRED initiation of cART
Death · HIV‐positive, treatment‐naive children aged one to 12 years old
It is very uncertain whether IMMEDIATE initiation of cART changes death compared with DEFERRED initiation of cART (very low certainty).
Optimal time for initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) in HIV‐infected, treatment‐naive children aged 2 to… (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 3 [0.12, 73.06]2 studies · 343 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Optimal time for initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) in HIV‐infected, treatment‐naive children aged 2 to 5 years old
2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.