Lifestyle vs control ‐ Neonatal and later outcomes: Composite outcome in infant (death, shoulder dystocia, nerve palsy, bone fracture)
It is very uncertain whether lifestyle changes composite outcome in infant (death, shoulder dystocia, nerve palsy,… compared with control ‐ Neonatal and later outcomes (very low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Lifestyle vs control ‐ Neonatal and later outcomes Composite outcome in infant (death, shoulder dystocia, nerve palsy, bone fracture) · Women with gestational diabetes It is very uncertain whether lifestyle changes composite outcome in infant (death, shoulder dystocia, nerve palsy,… compared with control ‐ Neonatal and later outcomes (very low certainty). Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of women with gestational diabetes (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.57 [0.21, 1.55] | 2 studies · 1930 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of women with gestational diabetes 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.