Question · asked by 1 review
Summary of findings table ‐ Intraperitoneal local anaesthetic vs control: Health related quality of life ‐ not measured
- Population
- people undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
- Intervention
- Summary of findings table ‐ Intraperitoneal local anaesthetic
- Comparison
- control
- Outcome
- Health related quality of life ‐ not measured
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings table ‐ Intraperitoneal local anaesthetic vs control Health related quality of life ‐ not measured · patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy The review found no eligible studies for this question. Intraperitoneal local anaesthetic instillation versus no intraperitoneal local anaesthetic instillation for… (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intraperitoneal local anaesthetic instillation versus no intraperitoneal local anaesthetic instillation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.