Question · asked by 1 review

Mandibular third molar present vs Mandibular third molar absent: Spontaneous space closure

Population
Children and adolescents after extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar (before eruption of the second molar)
Intervention
Mandibular third molar present
Comparison
Mandibular third molar absent
Outcome
Spontaneous space closure

In the mandible, presence of the third molar increases odds of spontaneous space closure (OR 2.28; low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Mandibular third molar present vs Mandibular third molar absent
Spontaneous space closure · Children and adolescents after extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar (before eruption of the second molar) · Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years), University clinics and hospitals in 8 countries (children/adolescents <18 years), Mandible
In the mandible, presence of the third molar increases odds of spontaneous space closure (OR 2.28; low certainty).
Spontaneous space closure after extraction of permanent first molars in children and adolescents: a… (2024) All outcomes
OR 2.28 [1.67, 3.09]4 studies · 467 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.