Tubeless PNL vs standard PNL: Sepsis or fever MCID: 50 per 1000
It is very uncertain whether tubeless PNL changes sepsis or fever MCID: 50 per 1000 compared with standard PNL (very low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Tubeless PNL vs standard PNL Sepsis or fever MCID: 50 per 1000 · treating kidney stones It is very uncertain whether tubeless PNL changes sepsis or fever MCID: 50 per 1000 compared with standard PNL (very low certainty). Totally tubeless, tubeless, and tubed percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating kidney stones (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.5 [0.05, 4.75] | 2 studies · 82 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Totally tubeless, tubeless, and tubed percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating kidney stones 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.