Question · asked by 0 reviews

Autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs No active treatment (control): Presence of dry socket

Population
Adults (>18 years) having permanent tooth extraction (predominantly mandibular third molars)
Intervention
Autologous platelet‐rich plasma
Comparison
No active treatment (control)
Outcome
Presence of dry socket

Platelet rich plasma showed no clear difference in presence of dry socket compared with control (no treatment); GRADE not reported.

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Platelet rich plasma vs Control (no treatment)
Presence of dry socket · Adults (>18 years) having permanent tooth extraction (predominantly mandibular third molars) · Follow-up: median 7 days
Platelet rich plasma showed no clear difference in presence of dry socket compared with control (no treatment); GRADE not reported.
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) (2012) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD006968.PUB2, superseded
RR 0.15 [0.01, 2.86]1 study · 21 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket)
2022 · Cochrane All outcomes
2021-09Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.