Question · asked by 1 review

Ethinyl estradiol 35 μg + cyproterone acetate 2 mg vs ethinyloestradiol and norgestrel: Number of participants reporting non‐serious adverse effects

Ethinyloestradiol and cyproterone acetate probably leads to lower number of participants reporting non‐serious adverse effects compared with ethinyloestradiol and norgestrel (moderate certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Ethinyloestradiol and cyproterone acetate vs ethinyloestradiol and norgestrel
Number of participants reporting non‐serious adverse effects · participants with hidradenitis suppurativa
Ethinyloestradiol and cyproterone acetate probably leads to lower number of participants reporting non‐serious adverse effects compared with ethinyloestradiol and norgestrel (moderate certainty).
Interventions for hidradenitis suppurativa (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.53 [0.29, 0.98]1 study · 18 participantsModerate

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions for hidradenitis suppurativa
2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.