Question · asked by 1 review

Equivalent schedules of intradermal fractional‐dose inactivated poliovirus vaccine vs intramuscular inactivated poliovirus vaccine: Seroconversion rate (after 2 primary doses)

Equivalent schedules of intradermal fractional‐dose inactivated… may leads to lower seroconversion rate (after 2 primary doses) compared with intramuscular inactivated poliovirus vaccine (low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Equivalent schedules of intradermal fractional‐dose inactivated poliovirus vaccine vs intramuscular inactivated poliovirus vaccine
Seroconversion rate (after 2 primary doses) · children
Equivalent schedules of intradermal fractional‐dose inactivated… may leads to lower seroconversion rate (after 2 primary doses) compared with intramuscular inactivated poliovirus vaccine (low certainty).
Equivalent schedules of intradermal fractional dose versus intramuscular full dose of inactivated polio… (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.23 [0.16, 0.33]3 studies · 981 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Equivalent schedules of intradermal fractional dose versus intramuscular full dose of inactivated polio vaccine for prevention of…
2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.