Heated tobacco use vs abstinence from tobacco: Adverse events 12 months postintervention
It is very uncertain whether heated tobacco use changes adverse events – measured by self‐report compared with abstinence from tobacco (very low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Heated tobacco use vs abstinence from tobacco Adverse events – measured by self‐report · people who smoke It is very uncertain whether heated tobacco use changes adverse events – measured by self‐report compared with abstinence from tobacco (very low certainty). Heated tobacco products for smoking cessation and reducing smoking prevalence (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.12 [0.86, 1.46] | 2 studies · 237 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heated tobacco products for smoking cessation and reducing smoking prevalence 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.