Question · asked by 1 review
Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens vs placebo/no treatment: Preterm birth
- Population
- women with recurrent miscarriage of unclear etiology
- Intervention
- Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens
- Comparison
- placebo/no treatment
- Outcome
- Preterm birth
It is very uncertain whether progestogen changes preterm birth compared with placebo/no treatment (very low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Progestogen vs placebo/no treatment Preterm birth · women with recurrent miscarriage of unclear etiology It is very uncertain whether progestogen changes preterm birth compared with placebo/no treatment (very low certainty). Progestogen for preventing miscarriage in women with recurrent miscarriage of unclear etiology (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.13 [0.53, 2.41] | 4 studies · 256 participants | Very low |
Progestogen vs placebo/no treatment Preterm birth · women with recurrent miscarriage of unclear etiology It is very uncertain whether progestogen changes preterm birth compared with placebo/no treatment (very low certainty). Progestogen for preventing miscarriage in women with recurrent miscarriage of unclear etiology (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD003511.PUB4, superseded | RR 1.13 [0.53, 2.41] | 4 studies · 256 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Progestogen for preventing miscarriage in women with recurrent miscarriage of unclear etiology 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.