Question · asked by 1 review
Impact of extended vs standard lymph node dissection on overall survival among patients with urothelial cancer of the bladder: Disease‐specific quality of life
- Population
- Partcipants with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy (male n = 314, female n = 87; age (interquartile range) 59 to 74)Country: Germany
- Intervention
- Impact of extended
- Comparison
- standard lymph node dissection on overall survival among patients with urothelial cancer of the bladder
- Outcome
- Disease‐specific quality of life
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Impact of extended vs standard lymph node dissection on overall survival among patients with urothelial cancer of the bladder Disease‐specific quality of life9 · Partcipants with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy (male n = 314, female n = 87; age (interquartile range)… The review found no eligible studies for this question. Extended versus standard lymph node dissection for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder in patients… (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extended versus standard lymph node dissection for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder in patients undergoing radical cystectomy 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.