Question · asked by 1 review
Hyperbaric oxygen vs No HBO therapy: Marginal bone level change
- Population
- Patients who have had radiotherapy and who have missing teeth that require replacement with osseointegrated dental implants
- Intervention
- Hyperbaric oxygen
- Comparison
- No HBO therapy
- Outcome
- Marginal bone level change
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy vs No HBO therapy Radiographic marginal bone level changes · Patients who have had radiotherapy and who have missing teeth that require replacement with osseointegrated dental… Interventions for replacing missing teeth: hyperbaric oxygen therapy for irradiated patients who require… (2013) · Cochrane All outcomes | Radiographic bone level changes (but not used since extrapolated from oblique lateral radiographs). | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy vs No HBO therapy Radiographic marginal bone level changes · Patients who have had radiotherapy and who have missing teeth that require replacement with osseointegrated dental… Interventions for replacing missing teeth: hyperbaric oxygen therapy for irradiated patients who require… (2008) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD003603.PUB2, superseded | Radiographic bone level changes: data presented, but not used since extrapolated from oblique lateral radiographs. | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: hyperbaric oxygen therapy for irradiated patients who require dental implants 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2013-06 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.