Question · asked by 0 reviews
Pulmonary rehabilitation vs no pulmonary rehabilitation: Adverse events
- Population
- people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
- Intervention
- Pulmonary rehabilitation
- Comparison
- no pulmonary rehabilitation
- Outcome
- Adverse events
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Pulmonary rehabilitation vs no pulmonary rehabilitation Adverse events · people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis Pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD006322.PUB3, superseded | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 62 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Pulmonary rehabilitation vs usual care · adults with asthma · 1 review
- Pulmonary rehabilitation vs no pulmonary rehabilitation · interstitial lung disease · 0 reviews
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.