Alcohol‐based handrub vs usual care: Incidence of (study author‐defined) suspected infection within the first 28 days of life
It is very uncertain whether alcohol‐based handrub changes incidence of suspected infections (author‐defined) within the first… compared with usual care (very low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Alcohol‐based handrub vs usual care Incidence of suspected infections (author‐defined) within the first 28 days of life · Neonates and caregivers It is very uncertain whether alcohol‐based handrub changes incidence of suspected infections (author‐defined) within the first… compared with usual care (very low certainty). Hand hygiene for the prevention of infections in neonates (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.98 [0.69, 1.39] | 1 study · 103 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hand hygiene for the prevention of infections in neonates 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.