Interventions directed at individuals: full financial coverage vs no financial coverage: Smoking cessation
Interventions directed at individuals: full financial coverage probably leads to higher abstinence from smoking compared with no financial coverage (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Interventions directed at individuals: full financial coverage vs no financial coverage Abstinence from smoking · smokers Interventions directed at individuals: full financial coverage probably leads to higher abstinence from smoking compared with no financial coverage (moderate certainty). Healthcare financing systems for increasing the use of tobacco dependence treatment (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.77 [1.37, 2.28] | 6 studies · 9333 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthcare financing systems for increasing the use of tobacco dependence treatment 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.