Question · asked by 1 review
Lamotrigine vs valproate: 80% or greater reduction in seizure frequency ‐ not reported
- Population
- absence seizures in children and adolescents
- Intervention
- Lamotrigine
- Comparison
- valproate
- Outcome
- 80% or greater reduction in seizure frequency ‐ not reported
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 2 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Lamotrigine vs valproate 80% or greater reduction in seizure frequency ‐ not reported · absence seizures in children and adolescents The review found no eligible studies for this question. Ethosuximide, sodium valproate or lamotrigine for absence seizures in children and adolescents (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Lamotrigine vs valproate 80% or greater reduction in seizure frequency ‐ not reported · absence seizures in children and adolescents The review found no eligible studies for this question. Ethosuximide, sodium valproate or lamotrigine for absence seizures in children and adolescents (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD003032.PUB4, superseded | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethosuximide, sodium valproate or lamotrigine for absence seizures in children and adolescents 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.