Question · asked by 1 review
Periodontitis vs No periodontitis (periodontal health or gingivitis): Mean DFR (decayed, filled root teeth)
- Population
- adults
- Intervention
- Periodontitis
- Comparison
- No periodontitis (periodontal health or gingivitis)
- Outcome
- Mean DFR (decayed, filled root teeth)
Patients with periodontitis had a significantly higher mean DFR (WMD 1.13).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Periodontitis vs No periodontitis (periodontal health or gingivitis) Mean DFR (decayed, filled root teeth) · Adults · Population-based and clinical dental study samples; multiple countries (1994-2022), Overall Patients with periodontitis had a significantly higher mean DFR (WMD 1.13). Association between periodontitis and dental caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2024) All outcomes | WMD 1.13 [0.48, 1.78] | 4 studies | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Association between periodontitis and dental caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2024 All outcomes | July 5, 2023 | 34 | Not applicable |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.