Question · asked by 1 review

Transepithelial CXL using iontophoresis vs epithelium‐off CXL: Proportion of participants whose maximum K decreased by at least 2 diopters—at 24 months

It is very uncertain whether transepithelial CXL using iontophoresis changes proportion of participants whose maximum K decreased by at least 2… compared with epithelium‐off CXL (very low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Transepithelial CXL using iontophoresis vs epithelium‐off CXL
Proportion of participants whose maximum K decreased by at least 2 diopters—at 24 months · participants with progressive keratoconus
It is very uncertain whether transepithelial CXL using iontophoresis changes proportion of participants whose maximum K decreased by at least 2… compared with epithelium‐off CXL (very low certainty).
Transepithelial versus epithelium‐off corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted1 study · 31 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Transepithelial versus epithelium‐off corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus
2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.