Question · asked by 1 review

Hall technique vs Conventional restoration: Adverse events: gingival bleeding

Population
Children (3-10 years) with dentine caries in primary molars
Intervention
Hall technique
Comparison
Conventional restoration
Outcome
Adverse events: gingival bleeding

The reported estimate for gingival bleeding with preformed metal crowns was inconclusive (ungraded).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Hall Technique preformed metal crowns vs Conventional restorations (amalgam, GIC, composite)
Gingival bleeding (adverse event) · Children (3-10 years) with dentine caries in primary molars · Not reported
The reported estimate for gingival bleeding with preformed metal crowns was inconclusive (ungraded).
Minimal intervention dentistry for managing carious lesions into dentine in primary teeth: an umbrella review. (2022) All outcomes
RR 1.09 [0.42, 2.86]2 studiesGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Minimal intervention dentistry for managing carious lesions into dentine in primary teeth: an umbrella review.
2022 All outcomes
August 202035Low / Low

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.