Question · asked by 1 review

Hall technique vs Non-restorative caries treatment: Adverse events: gingival bleeding

Population
Children with decayed primary molar teeth
Intervention
Hall technique
Comparison
Non-restorative caries treatment
Outcome
Adverse events: gingival bleeding

It is very uncertain whether preformed metal crown (fitted using the Hall Technique) changes adverse events: gingival bleeding compared with non-restorative caries treatment (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Preformed metal crown (fitted using the Hall Technique) vs Non-restorative caries treatment
Adverse events: gingival bleeding · Children with decayed primary molar teeth · Long term (12 months)
It is very uncertain whether preformed metal crown (fitted using the Hall Technique) changes adverse events: gingival bleeding compared with non-restorative caries treatment (very low certainty).
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth (2015) · Cochrane All outcomes
RR 1.09 [0.42, 2.86]1 study · 92 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth
2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
2015-01Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.