Question · asked by 1 review
Adverse event outcomes for dietary combined with physical activity interventions vs standard‐of‐care therapy: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: pre‐eclampsia
- Population
- pregnant women, excluding women already diagnosed with GDM in this pregnancy and those with pre‐existing diabetes mellitus
- Intervention
- Adverse event outcomes for dietary combined with physical activity interventions
- Comparison
- standard‐of‐care therapy
- Outcome
- Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: pre‐eclampsia
Combined diet and exercise interventions showed no clear difference in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (pre‐eclampsia) compared with standard care (mother) (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Combined diet and exercise interventions vs standard care (mother) Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (pre‐eclampsia) · pregnant women, excluding women already diagnosed with GDM, type 1 or type 2 diabetes Combined diet and exercise interventions showed no clear difference in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (pre‐eclampsia) compared with standard care (mother) (low certainty). Combined diet and exercise interventions for preventing gestational diabetes mellitus (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.98 [0.79, 1.22] | 8 studies · 5366 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combined diet and exercise interventions for preventing gestational diabetes mellitus 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.