Cochrane · systematic review · CD010443

Combined diet and exercise interventions for preventing gestational diabetes mellitus

Shepherd, E, Gomersall, JC, Tieu, J, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library

Pregnancy and ChildbirthAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
15
current version
GRADE rated
10
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 5 · 33.3%Very low 1 · 6.7%Low 5 · 33.3%Moderate 4 · 26.7%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Combined diet and exercise interventions versus standard care (mother)

Population: pregnant women, excluding women already diagnosed with GDM, type 1 or type 2 diabetes
8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
GDM
Combined diet and exercise interventions vs standard care (mother)
RR 0.85 [0.71, 1.01]19 studies · 6633 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (pre‐eclampsia)
Combined diet and exercise interventions vs standard care (mother)
RR 0.98 [0.79, 1.22]8 studies · 5366 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (pregnancy‐induced hypertension/hypertension)
Combined diet and exercise interventions vs standard care (mother)
RR 0.78 [0.47, 1.27]6 studies · 3073 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Caesarean section
Combined diet and exercise interventions vs standard care (mother)
RR 0.95 [0.88, 1.02]14 studies · 6089 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Perineal trauma
Combined diet and exercise interventions vs standard care (mother)
RR 1.27 [0.78, 2.05]2 studies · 2733 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Gestational weight gain (kg)
Combined diet and exercise interventions vs standard care (mother)
no estimate extracted16 studies · 5052 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Postnatal depression
Combined diet and exercise interventions vs standard care (mother)
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Combined diet and exercise interventions vs standard care (mother)
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded

Combined diet and exercise interventions versus standard care (child)

Population: pregnant women, excluding women already diagnosed with GDM, type 1 or type 2 diabetes
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Perinatal mortality
Combined diet and exercise interventions vs standard care (child)
RR 0.82 [0.42, 1.63]2 studies · 3757 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Large‐for‐gestational age
Combined diet and exercise interventions vs standard care (child)
RR 0.93 [0.81, 1.07]11 studies · 5353 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Mortality or morbidity composite
Combined diet and exercise interventions vs standard care (child)
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Neonatal hypoglycaemia
Combined diet and exercise interventions vs standard care (child)
RR 1.42 [0.67, 2.98]2 studies · 3653 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Childhood adiposity (latest time reported) (BMI z score)
Combined diet and exercise interventions vs standard care (child)
MD 0.052 studies · 794 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Combined diet and exercise interventions vs standard care (child)
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Neurosensory disability
Combined diet and exercise interventions vs standard care (child)
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded