Question · asked by 1 review
PFMT added to bladder training vs bladder training alone: Disease‐specific quality of life
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
PFMT added to bladder training vs bladder training alone Condition‐specific quality of life ‐ 3 months after treatment Incontinence Impact Questionnaire‐ Revised (IIQ‐R) · women with urinary incontinence Pelvic floor muscle training added to another active treatment versus the same active treatment alone for… (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 118 participants | Very low |
PFMT added to bladder training vs bladder training alone Condition‐specific quality of life ‐ 3 months after treatment Incontinence Impact Questionnaire‐ Revised (IIQ‐R) · patients with urinary incontinence in women Pelvic floor muscle training added to another active treatment versus the same active treatment alone for… (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD010551.PUB2, superseded | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 118 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pelvic floor muscle training added to another active treatment versus the same active treatment alone for urinary incontinence in women 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.