High MW HES vs Low MW HES: RIFLE (Risk or worse)
High MW HES showed no clear difference in RIFLE (Risk or worse) compared with low MW HES (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
High MW HES vs Low MW HES RIFLE (Risk or worse) · patients with Intravascular Volume Depletion High MW HES showed no clear difference in RIFLE (Risk or worse) compared with low MW HES (moderate certainty). Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) versus other fluid therapies: effects on kidney function (2010) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.54 [0.05, 5.59] | 2 studies · 113 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) versus other fluid therapies: effects on kidney function 2010 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.