Combination of interventions vs no intervention: ANC coverage: one or more visits
Combination of interventions probably leads to higher ANC coverage: one or more visits compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Combination of interventions vs no intervention ANC coverage: one or more visits · improving antenatal care coverage and health outcomes among pregnant women Combination of interventions probably leads to higher ANC coverage: one or more visits compared with no intervention (moderate certainty). Health system and community level interventions for improving antenatal care coverage and health outcomes (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | OR 1.79 [1.47, 2.17] | 5 studies · 12426 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health system and community level interventions for improving antenatal care coverage and health outcomes 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.