IVIg vs placebo or no intervention: All‐cause mortality, neonates, standard polyclonal IVIG
Polyclonal intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality, neonates, standard polyclonal IVIG compared with placebo or no intervention (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Polyclonal intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) vs placebo or no intervention All‐cause mortality, neonates, standard polyclonal IVIG · neonates with sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock Polyclonal intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality, neonates, standard polyclonal IVIG compared with placebo or no intervention (moderate certainty). Intravenous immunoglobulin for treating sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1 [0.92, 1.08] | 5 studies · 3667 participants | Moderate |
Polyclonal intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) vs placebo or no intervention Low risk of bias neonate studies, mortality all‐cause ‐ standard IVIG · neonates with sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock Polyclonal intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) showed no clear difference in low risk of bias neonate studies, mortality all‐cause ‐ standard IVIG compared with placebo or no intervention (high certainty). Intravenous immunoglobulin for treating sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.01 [0.93, 1.09] | 3 studies · 3561 participants | High |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intravenous immunoglobulin for treating sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.