Question · asked by 1 review

Buffered vs non‐buffered crystalloid intravenous fluid: Organ system failure ‐ renal insufficiency requiring support

Buffered showed no clear difference in organ system failure ‐ renal insufficiency requiring support compared with non‐buffered crystalloid intravenous fluid (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Buffered vs non‐buffered crystalloid intravenous fluid
Organ system failure ‐ renal insufficiency requiring support · adults receiving intravenous fluids whilst undergoing any form of surgery
Buffered showed no clear difference in organ system failure ‐ renal insufficiency requiring support compared with non‐buffered crystalloid intravenous fluid (low certainty).
Perioperative administration of buffered versus non‐buffered crystalloid intravenous fluid to improve… (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.82 [0.34, 1.98]4 studies · 267 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Perioperative administration of buffered versus non‐buffered crystalloid intravenous fluid to improve outcomes following adult surgical…
2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.