Question · asked by 1 review

Alcoholics Anonymous (AA)/Twelve‐Step Facilitation (TSF) (non‐manualized) vs a different type of TSF: Alcohol‐related consequences

Population
adults (> 18 years) with alcohol use disorder, alcohol abuse, or alcohol dependence
Intervention
Alcoholics Anonymous (AA)/Twelve‐Step Facilitation (TSF) (non‐manualized)
Comparison
a different type of TSF
Outcome
Alcohol‐related consequences

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

What each review found

Current versions only
No studies found 2 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Alcoholics Anonymous (AA)/Twelve‐Step Facilitation (TSF) (non‐manualized) vs a different type of TSF
Alcohol‐related consequences · adults (> 18 years) with alcohol use disorder, alcohol abuse, or alcohol dependence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Alcoholics Anonymous and other 12‐step programs for alcohol use disorder (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extractedNot reportedNo studies found
Alcoholics Anonymous (AA)/Twelve‐Step Facilitation (TSF) (non‐manualized) vs a different type of TSF
Alcohol‐related consequences · adults (> 18 years) with alcohol use disorder, alcohol abuse, or alcohol dependence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Alcoholics Anonymous and other 12‐step programs for alcohol use disorder (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extractedNot reportedNo studies found

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Alcoholics Anonymous and other 12‐step programs for alcohol use disorder
2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.