Question · asked by 1 review
Prehabilitation vs no prehabilitation: Safety of the programme (dropout, SAE)
- Population
- Patients with outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery
- Intervention
- Prehabilitation
- Comparison
- no prehabilitation
- Outcome
- Safety of the programme (dropout, SAE)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 2 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Prehabilitation vs no prehabilitation Safety of the programme (dropout, SAE) · adult patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer The review found no eligible studies for this question. Prehabilitation versus no prehabilitation to improve functional capacity, reduce postoperative complications… (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Prehabilitation vs no prehabilitation Safety of the programme (dropout, SAE) · adult patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer The review found no eligible studies for this question. Prehabilitation versus no prehabilitation to improve functional capacity, reduce postoperative complications… (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD013259.PUB2, superseded | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prehabilitation versus no prehabilitation to improve functional capacity, reduce postoperative complications and improve quality of life… 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.