Question · asked by 1 review
Fixed-appliance orthodontic treatment incorporating surgically assisted orthodontics (adjunctive surgical procedure: corticotomy, micro-osteoperforation or interseptal bone reduction) to increase the rate of tooth movement vs Conventional orthodontic appliance treatment: Discomfort/pain
- Population
- Individuals of any age receiving orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances (braces) (people requiring orthodontic tooth movement); participants treated with orthognathic surgery or with cleft lip or palate or other craniofacial deformity/syndrome excluded
- Intervention
- Fixed-appliance orthodontic treatment incorporating surgically assisted orthodontics (adjunctive surgical procedure: corticotomy, micro-osteoperforation or interseptal bone reduction) to increase the rate of tooth movement
- Comparison
- Conventional orthodontic appliance treatment
- Outcome
- Discomfort/pain
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Fixed-appliance orthodontic treatment incorporating surgically assisted orthodontics (adjunctive surgical procedure: corticotomy, micro-osteoperforation or interseptal bone reduction) to increase the rate of tooth movement vs Conventional treatment: fixed-appliance orthodontic treatment without surgical assistance Patient-reported outcome: pain experience (discomfort) · Individuals of any age receiving orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances (braces) (people requiring orthodontic… · 24 hours to 28 days Surgical adjunctive procedures for accelerating orthodontic treatment (2015) · Cochrane All outcomes | Results: 'Pain experience was compared between surgical and non‐surgical cases in a single study (Alikhani 2013). Within 24 hours of appliance activation and canine retraction, both groups reported higher levels of… | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surgical adjunctive procedures for accelerating orthodontic treatment 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2014-09 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.