Question · asked by 1 review

Prenatal vitamin D deficiency (low maternal 25(OH)D during pregnancy) vs Adequate prenatal vitamin D (sufficient maternal 25(OH)D): Dental caries in children

Population
Infants and children (aged about 2 to 8 years) whose mothers' vitamin D status was assessed during pregnancy
Intervention
Prenatal vitamin D deficiency (low maternal 25(OH)D during pregnancy)
Comparison
Adequate prenatal vitamin D (sufficient maternal 25(OH)D)
Outcome
Dental caries in children

For prenatal vitamin D measured across gestational weeks 6-38, the OR of dental caries was 1.32 (no CI reported); ungraded.

What each review found

Current versions only
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 3 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Prenatal vitamin D deficiency (maternal 25(OH)D measured at gestational weeks 6 to 38) vs Adequate prenatal vitamin D (sufficient maternal 25(OH)D)
Dental caries in children · Infants and children (aged about 2 to 8 years) whose mothers' vitamin D status was assessed during pregnancy · Maternal 25(OH)D measured at gestational weeks 6 to 38, Observational pregnancy/birth-cohort studies (one cross-sectional), mostly in developed countries (USA, Canada, Japan, Australia, Spain, Netherlands, Poland, New Zealand, Turkey), Gestational-age subgroup: weeks 6 to 38
For prenatal vitamin D measured across gestational weeks 6-38, the OR of dental caries was 1.32 (no CI reported); ungraded.
Association between prenatal vitamin D deficiency with dental caries in infants and children: a systematic… (2024) All outcomes
OR 1.32 [1.04, 1.59]4 studiesGRADE not reported
Prenatal vitamin D deficiency (low maternal 25(OH)D during pregnancy) vs Adequate prenatal vitamin D (sufficient maternal 25(OH)D)
Dental caries in children · Infants and children (aged about 2 to 8 years) whose mothers' vitamin D status was assessed during pregnancy · Prenatal exposure; dental caries assessed in children aged 2 to 8 years, Observational pregnancy/birth-cohort studies (one cross-sectional), mostly in developed countries (USA, Canada, Japan, Australia, Spain, Netherlands, Poland, New Zealand, Turkey), Overall (all studies pooled)
Prenatal vitamin D deficiency is associated with significantly higher odds of dental caries in children (pooled OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.22-1.47), but heterogeneity is high (I2=86.6%) and publication bias is present; the observational evidence is ungraded.
Association between prenatal vitamin D deficiency with dental caries in infants and children: a systematic… (2024) All outcomes
OR 1.35 [1.22, 1.47]12 studies · 11021 participantsGRADE not reported
Prenatal vitamin D deficiency (low maternal 25(OH)D during pregnancy) vs Adequate prenatal vitamin D (sufficient maternal 25(OH)D)
Dental caries in children · Infants and children (aged about 2 to 8 years) whose mothers' vitamin D status was assessed during pregnancy · Prenatal exposure; dental caries in children aged 2 to 8 years, Observational pregnancy/birth-cohort studies (one cross-sectional), mostly in developed countries (USA, Canada, Japan, Australia, Spain, Netherlands, Poland, New Zealand, Turkey), Publication-bias adjustment: Trim & Fill corrected pooled estimate
After Trim & Fill correction for publication bias, the association persisted (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.14-1.48); ungraded.
Association between prenatal vitamin D deficiency with dental caries in infants and children: a systematic… (2024) All outcomes
OR 1.28 [1.14, 1.48]Not reportedGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Association between prenatal vitamin D deficiency with dental caries in infants and children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
2024 All outcomes
5 October 2023 (search range 2000 to October 2023)16Not applicable

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

Studies behind the findings

The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.