Question · asked by 1 review
Two per cent CHG vs alcohol hand sanitiser (61% alcohol and emollients): Late neonatal mortality
- Population
- Neonates and caregivers
- Intervention
- Two per cent CHG
- Comparison
- alcohol hand sanitiser (61% alcohol and emollients)
- Outcome
- Late neonatal mortality
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Two per cent CHG vs alcohol hand sanitiser (61% alcohol and emollients) All‐cause mortality from the 8th to 28th day of life (late neonatal death) · Neonates and caregivers The review found no eligible studies for this question. Hand hygiene for the prevention of infections in neonates (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hand hygiene for the prevention of infections in neonates 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.