Question · asked by 1 review
Caries assessment at dentine threshold (cavitation into dentine) vs None (descriptive prevalence review; subgroup analyses by urban/rural status, country and year): Dental caries prevalence
- Population
- European adolescents aged 12–19 years
- Intervention
- Caries assessment at dentine threshold (cavitation into dentine)
- Comparison
- None (descriptive prevalence review; subgroup analyses by urban/rural status, country and year)
- Outcome
- Dental caries prevalence
Caries prevalence at the dentine threshold was about 56% (pooled 0.56, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.68; 15 studies; not GRADE-rated).
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 7 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Caries assessment at dentine threshold (cavitation into dentine) vs None (descriptive prevalence review; subgroup analyses only) Caries prevalence · European adolescents aged 12–19 years · Europe (community, subnational and national dental surveys) Caries prevalence at the dentine threshold was about 56% (pooled 0.56, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.68; 15 studies; not GRADE-rated). Dental caries at enamel and dentine level among European adolescents - a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2022) All outcomes | Prevalence 0.56 [0.43, 0.68] | 15 studies | GRADE not reported |
Caries assessment at dentine threshold (cavitation into dentine) vs None (descriptive prevalence review; subgroup analyses only) Caries prevalence · European adolescents aged 12–19 years · Europe (community, subnational and national dental surveys), Region: Scandinavian Dentine-threshold caries prevalence in subgroup 'Region: Scandinavian' was 0.49 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.67; 9 studies). Dental caries at enamel and dentine level among European adolescents - a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2022) All outcomes | Prevalence 0.49 [0.32, 0.67] | 9 studies | GRADE not reported |
Caries assessment at dentine threshold (cavitation into dentine) vs None (descriptive prevalence review; subgroup analyses only) Caries prevalence · European adolescents aged 12–19 years · Europe (community, subnational and national dental surveys), Region: non-Scandinavian Dentine-threshold caries prevalence in subgroup 'Region: non-Scandinavian' was 0.57 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.81; 6 studies). Dental caries at enamel and dentine level among European adolescents - a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2022) All outcomes | Prevalence 0.57 [0.32, 0.81] | 6 studies | GRADE not reported |
Caries assessment at dentine threshold (cavitation into dentine) vs None (descriptive prevalence review; subgroup analyses only) Caries prevalence · European adolescents aged 12–19 years · Europe (community, subnational and national dental surveys), Examination type: partial-mouth Dentine-threshold caries prevalence in subgroup 'Examination type: partial-mouth' was 0.50 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.94; 3 studies). Dental caries at enamel and dentine level among European adolescents - a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2022) All outcomes | Prevalence 0.50 [0.06, 0.94] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
Caries assessment at dentine threshold (cavitation into dentine) vs None (descriptive prevalence review; subgroup analyses only) Caries prevalence · European adolescents aged 12–19 years · Europe (community, subnational and national dental surveys), Publication year: ≥ 2010 Dentine-threshold caries prevalence in subgroup 'Publication year: ≥ 2010' was 0.51 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.66; 11 studies). Dental caries at enamel and dentine level among European adolescents - a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2022) All outcomes | Prevalence 0.51 [0.36, 0.66] | 11 studies | GRADE not reported |
Caries assessment at dentine threshold (cavitation into dentine) vs None (descriptive prevalence review; subgroup analyses only) Caries prevalence · European adolescents aged 12–19 years · Europe (community, subnational and national dental surveys), Examination type: full-mouth Dentine-threshold caries prevalence in subgroup 'Examination type: full-mouth' was 0.53 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.68; 12 studies). Dental caries at enamel and dentine level among European adolescents - a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2022) All outcomes | Prevalence 0.53 [0.38, 0.68] | 12 studies | GRADE not reported |
Caries assessment at dentine threshold (cavitation into dentine) vs None (descriptive prevalence review; subgroup analyses only) Caries prevalence · European adolescents aged 12–19 years · Europe (community, subnational and national dental surveys), Publication year: < 2010 Dentine-threshold caries prevalence in subgroup 'Publication year: < 2010' was 0.56 (95% CI 0.22 to 0.90; 4 studies). Dental caries at enamel and dentine level among European adolescents - a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2022) All outcomes | Prevalence 0.56 [0.22, 0.90] | 4 studies | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dental caries at enamel and dentine level among European adolescents - a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2022 All outcomes | 1 January 2000 to 20 September 2021 | 30 | Not applicable |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Caries assessment at dentine threshold (cavitation into dentine) vs None (single-group incidence) · European adolescents aged 18 years · 1 review
- Caries assessment at dentine threshold (cavitation into dentine) vs None (single-group incidence) · European adolescents aged 16 years · 1 review
- Caries assessment at dentine threshold (cavitation into dentine) vs None (single-group incidence) · European adolescents aged 12 years · 1 review
- Caries assessment at dentine threshold (cavitation into dentine) vs None (single-group incidence) · European adolescents aged 15 years · 1 review
- Caries assessment at dentine threshold (cavitation into dentine) vs None (single-group incidence) · European adolescents aged 17 years · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.