Question · asked by 1 review
Immediate vs deferred delivery of the preterm baby with suspected fetal compromise: Serious neonatal morbidity
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Immediate vs deferred delivery of the preterm baby with suspected fetal compromise Serious neonatal morbidity (composite outcome including bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) · pregnant women at less than 36 weeks' gestation in whom there is clinical suspicion of fetal compromise Immediate versus deferred delivery of the preterm baby with suspected fetal compromise for improving outcomes (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 2 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate versus deferred delivery of the preterm baby with suspected fetal compromise for improving outcomes 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.