Question · asked by 1 review
CBT vs attention control: Anxiety
- Population
- children and adolescents with anxiety disorders
- Intervention
- CBT
- Comparison
- attention control
- Outcome
- Anxiety
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
CBT vs attention control Reduction in anxiety symptoms (child report) post‐treatment · children and adolescents with anxiety disorders Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 15 studies · 978 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- CBT vs control · Women with non‐metastatic breast cancer · 1 review
- CBT vs treatment · children and adolescents with anxiety disorders · 1 review
- CBT vs TRT (directive counselling and bilateral masking) · adults with tinnitus · 1 review
- CBT vs treatment · depression and anxiety for people with dementia and MCI · 1 review
- CBT vs alternative treatment · children and adolescents with anxiety disorders · 1 review
- CBT vs audiological care (tinnitus education and rehabilitation · adults with tinnitus · 1 review
- CBT vs no treatment or waiting list · adults with tinnitus · 1 review
- CBT vs other experimental control · adults with tinnitus · 1 review
- CBT vs usual care · people with ESKD · 1 review
- CBT vs usual care · adults and adolescents with asthma · 1 review
- CBT vs control · patients with pathological and problem gambling · 1 review
- CBT vs WAIT LIST · children and adolescents with anxiety disorders · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.