Antibiotics on removal of central venous catheter vs no antibiotics: Central line‐associated blood stream infection
Antibiotics on removal of central venous catheter showed no clear difference in central line‐associated blood stream infection compared with no antibiotics (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Antibiotics on removal of central venous catheter vs no antibiotics Central line‐associated blood stream infection · newborn infants undergoing removal of central venous catheter Antibiotics on removal of central venous catheter showed no clear difference in central line‐associated blood stream infection compared with no antibiotics (low certainty). Antibiotics at the time of removal of central venous catheter to reduce morbidity and mortality in newborn… (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.09 [0.01, 1.6] | 1 study · 88 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antibiotics at the time of removal of central venous catheter to reduce morbidity and mortality in newborn infants 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.