PFMT added to HSGS vs HSGS alone: Number of women cured
PFMT added to HSGS probably leads to higher number of women cured compared with HSGS alone (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
PFMT added to HSGS vs HSGS alone Number of women cured · women with urinary incontinence PFMT added to HSGS probably leads to higher number of women cured compared with HSGS alone (moderate certainty). Pelvic floor muscle training added to another active treatment versus the same active treatment alone for… (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 2.38 [1.19, 4.73] | 1 study · 74 participants | Moderate |
PFMT added to HSGS vs HSGS alone Number of women cured · patients with urinary incontinence in women PFMT added to HSGS probably leads to higher number of women cured compared with HSGS alone (moderate certainty). Pelvic floor muscle training added to another active treatment versus the same active treatment alone for… (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD010551.PUB2, superseded | RR 2.38 [1.19, 4.73] | 1 study · 74 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pelvic floor muscle training added to another active treatment versus the same active treatment alone for urinary incontinence in women 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.