Studies

Primary studies

26,293 studies included by 1,022 non-Cochrane dental reviews extracted from full text, one record per study, so a study included by several reviews is counted once. Most are randomized trials; etiology and diagnostic reviews also include observational and accuracy studies. Cochrane reviews and reviews with only their headline outcomes do not list their included studies here yet.

34 studies

Sort:Most sharedNewestOldest
StudyYearReviewsReview outcomes linkedTrial data
Clinical comparison of a micro-hybride resin-based composite and resin modified glass ionomer in the treatment of cervical caries lesions: 36-month,…
Koc Vural et al. 2020a · Koc Vural Uzay, Kerimova Leyla, et al. · Odontology
PMID:32902766
202131not extracted yet
A randomized controlled 10 years follow up of a glass ionomer restorative material in class I and class II cavities.
Gurgan et al. 2020 · Gurgan Sevil, Kutuk Zeynep Bilge, et al. · Journal of dentistry
PMID:31351909
202031not extracted yet
Clinical Performance of a Glass-Hybrid System Compared with a Resin Composite in the Posterior Region: Results of a 2-year Multicenter Study.
Miletic et al. 2020 · Miletić Ivana, Baraba Anja, et al. · The journal of adhesive dentistry
PMID:32435764
202031not extracted yet
A randomized controlled evaluation of posterior resin restorations of an altered resin modified glass-ionomer cement with claimed bioactivity.
Van Dijken et al. 2019 · van Dijken Jan W V, Pallesen Ulla, et al. · Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials
PMID:30527586
201931not extracted yet
Clinical Effectiveness of a Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and a Mild One-step Self-etch Adhesive Applied Actively and Passively in Noncarious…
Jassal et al. 2018 · Jassal M, Mittal S, et al. · Operative dentistry
PMID:29782222
201831not extracted yet
Two-year clinical performance of glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in xerostomic head- and neck-irradiated cancer patients.
De Moor et al. 2011 · De Moor Roeland J G, Stassen Inge G, et al. · Clinical oral investigations
PMID:19997859
201131not extracted yet
A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up.
Pollington et al. 2008 · Pollington Sarah, van Noort Richard · American journal of dentistry
PMID:18435377
200831not extracted yet
Three-year clinical evaluation of a compomer and a resin composite as Class V filling materials.
Gallo et al. 2005 · Gallo John R, Burgess John O, et al. · Operative dentistry
PMID:15986945
200531not extracted yet
3-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the performance of posterior composite restorations lined with ion-releasing materials.
Ahmed 2024 · Ahmed Basma, Wafaie Ramy Ahmed, et al. · Scientific reports
PMID:38418863
202421not extracted yet
Clinical performance of an alkasite-based bioactive restorative in class II cavities: a randomized clinical trial.
Oz et al. [21] · Oz Fatma Dilsad, Meral Ece, et al. · Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB
PMID:37377309
202321not extracted yet
A prospective and randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of ART restorations with high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement versus…
Menezes-Silva 2021 · Menezes-Silva Rafael, Velasco Sofia R Maito, et al. · Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB
PMID:33656064
202121not extracted yet
Randomized Controlled Trial of Class II ART High-viscosity Glass-ionomer Cement and Conventional Resin-composite restorations in Permanent…
Molina 2020 · Molina Gustavo Fabián, Ulloque María Jorgelina, et al. · The journal of adhesive dentistry
PMID:33491400
202021not extracted yet
Clinical Evaluation of Microhybrid Composite and Glass lonomer Restorative Material in Permanent Teeth.
Kharma 2018 · Kharma Khalil, Zogheib Tatiana, et al. · The journal of contemporary dental practice
PMID:29422475
201821not extracted yet
Seven-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer restorations in noncarious cervical lesions.
Fagundes 2014 · Fagundes T C, Barata T J E, et al. · Operative dentistry
PMID:24809539
201421not extracted yet
Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school…
Frencken 2007 · Frencken J E, van't Hof M A, et al. · Community dentistry and oral epidemiology
PMID:17518967
200721not extracted yet
5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions.
Franco 2006 · Franco Eduardo Batista, Benetti Ana Raquel, et al. · Operative dentistry
PMID:16924979
200621not extracted yet
Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall.
Burgess 2004 · Burgess John O, Gallo John R, et al. · American journal of dentistry
PMID:15301207
200421not extracted yet
Three restorative materials and topical fluoride gel used in xerostomic patients: a clinical comparison.
Haveman 2003 · Haveman Carl W, Summitt James B, et al. · Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)
PMID:12636121
200321not extracted yet
Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches.
Mandari 2003 · Mandari G J, Frencken J E, et al. · Caries research
PMID:12771499
200321not extracted yet
Clinical evaluation of three restorative materials applied in a minimal intervention caries treatment approach.
Zanata 2003 · Zanata Regia L, Navarro Maria F L, et al. · Journal of public health dentistry
PMID:14682645
200321not extracted yet
A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in…
McComb 2002 · McComb D, Erickson R L, et al. · Operative dentistry
PMID:12216559
200221not extracted yet
Three-year clinical evaluation of a resin modified glass-ionomer cement and a composite resin in non-carious class V lesions.
Ozgunaltay 2002 · Ozgünaltay G, Onen A · Journal of oral rehabilitation
PMID:12453256
200221not extracted yet
Durability of new restorative materials in Class III cavities.
van Dijken 2003 · van Dijken J W · The journal of adhesive dentistry
PMID:11317385
200121not extracted yet
Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
Donly 1999 · Donly K J, Segura A, et al. · Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)
PMID:10570589
199921not extracted yet
3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations.
van Dijken 1996 · van Dijken J W · American journal of dentistry
PMID:9545903
199621not extracted yet
Five-year study of Class II restorations in permanent teeth using amalgam, glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cerment and resin-based composite materials.
Mjor 1993 · Mjör I A, Jokstad A · Journal of dentistry
PMID:8258583
199321not extracted yet
Clinical comparison of Class V resin composite and glass ionomer restorations.
Powell 1992 · Powell L V, Gordon G E, et al. · American journal of dentistry
PMID:1299249
199221not extracted yet
Class II amalgam restorations, glass-ionomer tunnel restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: a 3-year clinical study.
Svanberg 1992 · Svanberg M · Caries research
PMID:1423449
199221not extracted yet
Two-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the performance of posterior bulk-fill resin composite with ionic releasing restorative material.
Raghip et al. [54] · Raghip Ahmad Gamal Mohamed, Comisi John C, et al. · Journal of dentistry
PMID:40518039
202511not extracted yet
Influence of Bioactive Restorative Materials on Secondary Caries Prevention: A Clinical and In Vitro Study.
Sonbul [22] · Sonbul Helal M · Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences
PMID:40655776
202511not extracted yet
Microhardness and elemental analysis of ion-releasing restoration/ dentin interface following enzymatic chemomechanical caries excavation.
Al-Wakeel et al. [18] · Al-Wakeel Rana E, Hamama Hamdi H, et al. · BMC oral health
PMID:38764034
202411not extracted yet
Clinical evaluation of Giomer and self-etch adhesive compared with nanofilled resin composite and etch-and-rinse adhesive - Results at 8 years.
Tian et al. [23] · Tian Fucong, Mu Haili, et al. · Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials
PMID:38806383
202411not extracted yet
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Injectable Resin Composite vs Conventional Nanohybrid Composite in Posterior Restorations: An 18-Month Randomized…
Elderiny et al. [19] · Elderiny Hazem M, Khallaf Yomna S, et al. · The journal of contemporary dental practice
PMID:39653674
202411not extracted yet
Three-year clinical performance of direct restorations using low-shrinkage Giomer vs. nano-hybrid resin composite.
Toz-Akalin et al. [24] · Toz-Akalin Tugba, Öztürk-Bozkurt Funda, et al. · Frontiers in dental medicine
PMID:39917677
202411not extracted yet