Studies

Primary studies

26,293 studies included by 1,022 non-Cochrane dental reviews extracted from full text, one record per study, so a study included by several reviews is counted once. Most are randomized trials; etiology and diagnostic reviews also include observational and accuracy studies. Cochrane reviews and reviews with only their headline outcomes do not list their included studies here yet.

25 studies

Sort:Most sharedNewestOldest
StudyYearReviewsReview outcomes linkedTrial data
Accuracy of edentulous full-arch implant impression: An in vitro comparison between conventional impression, intraoral scan with and without…
Cheng 2024 · Cheng Jing, Zhang Haidong, et al. · Clinical oral implants research
PMID:38421115
20242none statednot extracted yet
Comparison of the accuracy between conventional and various digital implant impressions for an implant-supported mandibular complete arch-fixed…
Kosago 2023 · Kosago Pitchaporn, Ungurawasaporn Chatcharwin, et al. · Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists
PMID:36083233
20232none statednot extracted yet
Accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impression with intraoral optical scanning and stereophotogrammetry: An in vivo prospective comparative…
Pozzi 2023 · Pozzi Alessandro, Carosi Paolo, et al. · Clinical oral implants research
PMID:37485737
20232none statednot extracted yet
Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro…
Ma 2021 · Ma Bowen, Yue Xinxin, et al. · BMC oral health
PMID:34893053
20212none statednot extracted yet
Accuracy of different digital acquisition methods in complete arch implant-supported prostheses: An in vitro study
Pinto 2023 · Pinto Ricardo J., Casado Sara A., et al. · The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.07.008
20241none statednot extracted yet
Accuracy of edentulous full‐arch implant impression: An in vitro comparison between conventional impression, intraoral scan with and without…
Cheng 2024 · Cheng Jing, Zhang Haidong, et al. · Clinical Oral Implants Research
DOI:10.1111/clr.14252
20241none statednot extracted yet
Accuracy of intraoral optical scan versus stereophotogrammetry for complete-arch digital implant impression: An in vitro study.
Pozzi 2024 · Pozzi Alessandro, Agliardi Enrico, et al. · Journal of prosthodontic research
PMID:37574278
20241none statednot extracted yet
Accuracy of different digital acquisition methods in complete arch implant-supported prostheses: An in vitro study.
Pinto 2024 · Pinto Ricardo J, Casado Sara A, et al. · The Journal of prosthetic dentistry
PMID:37620183
20241none statednot extracted yet
Accuracy of intraoral scan with prefabricated aids and stereophotogrammetry compared with open tray impressions for complete-arch implant-supported…
Fu 2024 · Fu Xiao-Jiao, Liu Min, et al. · Clinical oral implants research
PMID:37746813
20241none statednot extracted yet
Comparison between stereophotogrammetric, digital, and conventional impression techniques in implant-supported fixed complete arch prostheses: An…
Tohme 2023 · Tohme Hani, Lawand Ghida, et al. · The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.05.006
20231none statednot extracted yet
Accuracy of 2 direct digital scanning techniques—intraoral scanning and stereophotogrammetry—for complete arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: A…
Yan 2023 · Yan Yuwei, Lin Xiao, et al. · The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.03.033
20231none statednot extracted yet
Accuracy of complete‐arch digital implant impression with intraoral optical scanning and stereophotogrammetry: An in vivo prospective comparative…
Pozzi 2023 · Pozzi Alessandro, Carosi Paolo, et al. · Clinical Oral Implants Research
DOI:10.1111/clr.14141
20231none statednot extracted yet
Accuracy of intraoral scan with prefabricated aids and stereophotogrammetry compared with open tray impressions for complete‐arch implant‐supported…
Fu 2023 · Fu Xiao‐Jiao, Liu Min, et al. · Clinical Oral Implants Research
DOI:10.1111/clr.14183
20231none statednot extracted yet
Accuracy of intraoral optical scan versus stereophotogrammetry for complete-arch digital implant impression: An <i>in vitro</i> study
Pozzi 2024 · Pozzi Alessandro, Agliardi Enrico, et al. · Journal of Prosthodontic Research
DOI:10.2186/jpr.jpr_d_22_00251
20231none statednot extracted yet
Comparison between stereophotogrammetric, digital, and conventional impression techniques in implant-supported fixed complete arch prostheses: An…
Tohme 2023 · Tohme Hani, Lawand Ghida, et al. · The Journal of prosthetic dentistry
PMID:34112521
20231none statednot extracted yet
Accuracy of 2 direct digital scanning techniques-intraoral scanning and stereophotogrammetry-for complete arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: A…
Yan 2023 · Yan Yuwei, Lin Xiao, et al. · The Journal of prosthetic dentistry
PMID:35667889
20231none statednot extracted yet
Comparative study of the accuracy of an implant intraoral scanner and that of a conventional intraoral scanner for complete-arch fixed dental…
Sallorenzo 2022 · Sallorenzo Alessandro, Gómez-Polo Miguel · The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.01.032
20221none statednot extracted yet
Comparison of the accuracy between conventional and various digital implant impressions for an implant‐supported mandibular complete arch‐fixed…
Kosago 2023 · Kosago Pitchaporn, Ungurawasaporn Chatcharwin, et al. · Journal of Prosthodontics
DOI:10.1111/jopr.13604
20221none statednot extracted yet
In Vivo Complete-Arch Implant Digital Impressions: Comparison of the Precision of Three Optical Impression Systems
Orejas-Perez 2022 · Orejas-Perez Jaime, Gimenez-Gonzalez Beatriz, et al. · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
DOI:10.3390/ijerph19074300
20221none statednot extracted yet
Comparative study of the accuracy of an implant intraoral scanner and that of a conventional intraoral scanner for complete-arch fixed dental…
Sallorenzo 2022 · Sallorenzo Alessandro, Gómez-Polo Miguel · The Journal of prosthetic dentistry
PMID:33836855
20221none statednot extracted yet
In Vivo Complete-Arch Implant Digital Impressions: Comparison of the Precision of Three Optical Impression Systems.
Orejas-Perez 2022 · Orejas-Perez Jaime, Gimenez-Gonzalez Beatriz, et al. · International journal of environmental research and public health
PMID:35409985
20221none statednot extracted yet
Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a…
Revilla-Leon 2021 · Revilla-León Marta, Att Wael, et al. · The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.005
20211none statednot extracted yet
Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro…
Ma 2021 · Ma Bowen, Yue Xinxin, et al. · BMC Oral Health
DOI:10.1186/s12903-021-02005-0
20211none statednot extracted yet
Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a…
Revilla-Leon 2021 · Revilla-León Marta, Att Wael, et al. · The Journal of prosthetic dentistry
PMID:32386912
20211none statednot extracted yet
Tohme 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1none statednot extracted yet