Primary study · included by 1 review
Comparison of Design, Cyclic Fatigue Resistance, and Metallurgical Properties of Original, Replica-Like, and Counterfeit Nickel-Titanium Files.
Unal 2026 (ref 39) · Unal Mert, Cakici Elif Bahar · Microscopy research and technique · 2026
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Time to fracture (TTF), cyclic fatigue resistance Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files | SMD -1.197 [-1.830, -0.564] | NR | GRADE not reported |
Time to fracture (TTF), cyclic fatigue resistance Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files | SMD -0.579 [-3.021, 1.862] | NR | GRADE not reported |
Time to fracture (TTF), cyclic fatigue resistance Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files | SMD -0.845 [-1.268, -0.423] | 13 studies | GRADE not reported |
1 including review in total.