Primary study · included by 1 review

Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of 'Replica-Like" and Original Reciprocating Instruments in Single and Double Curvatures.

Tarragó 2025 (ref 37) · Tarragó Celia, Valencia De Pablo Oliver, Loroño Gaizka, et al. · European endodontic journal · 2025

Included by

Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of original and replica-like files: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Tarrago 2025 · Table 2; Study characteristics; reference list
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Time to fracture (TTF), cyclic fatigue resistance
Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files
SMD -1.197 [-1.830, -0.564]NRGRADE not reported
Time to fracture (TTF), cyclic fatigue resistance
Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files
SMD -0.579 [-3.021, 1.862]NRGRADE not reported
Time to fracture (TTF), cyclic fatigue resistance
Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files
SMD -0.845 [-1.268, -0.423]13 studiesGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.