Primary study · included by 1 review
Unveiling the Effects of Cruciferous Vegetable Intake on Different Cancers: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-analysis.
Zheng 2024 · Zheng Sicong, Yan Jielin, Wang Jiaxin, et al. · Nutrition reviews · 2025
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Risk of bladder cancer Higher cruciferous vegetable intake (amount unspecified) vs Lower cruciferous vegetable intake | OR 1.00 [0.88, 1.13] | 10 studies · 1463894 participants | Very low |
Risk of bladder cancer Higher cruciferous vegetable intake (amount unspecified) vs Lower cruciferous vegetable intake | OR 0.55 [0.35, 0.88] | 6 studies · 3854 participants | Very low |
Risk of bladder cancer Cruciferous vegetable intake above 262.5 g per week vs Lower intake (dose-response reference) | OR 0.91 [0.77, 1.07] | 10 studies · 1463894 participants | Very low |
Risk of bladder cancer Cruciferous vegetable intake of at least 412.5 g per week vs Lower intake (dose-response reference) | OR 0.79 [0.67, 0.92] | 6 studies · 3854 participants | Low |
1 including review in total.