Primary study · included by 1 review

Evaluation of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Novel Replica-Like Instruments in Static Test Model.

Aydın 2024 (ref 31) · Aydın Uğur, Özdemir Melih, Çulha Emre, et al. · Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2024

Included by

Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of original and replica-like files: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Aydin 2024 · Table 2; Study characteristics; reference list
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Number of cycles to fracture (NCF), cyclic fatigue resistance
Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files
SMD -1.532 [-3.615, 0.550]5 studiesGRADE not reported
Number of cycles to fracture (NCF), cyclic fatigue resistance
Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files
SMD -1.719 [-4.270, 0.833]NRGRADE not reported
Number of cycles to fracture (NCF), cyclic fatigue resistance
Replica-like Ni-Ti endodontic files vs Original-brand Ni-Ti endodontic files
SMD -1.395 [-4.075, 1.286]NRGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.