evidencegaps
Primary study · included by 1 review

3D quantitative analysis and SEM qualitative analysis of natural antagonist enamel opposing CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia or lithium disilicate tooth-supported crowns versus enamel opposing natural enamel.

Woraganjanaboon 2024 · Woraganjanaboon Piyarat, Anunmana Chuchai · The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2024

Included by

Comparative Wear of Opposing Natural Enamel by Different Ceramic Materials in Fixed Dental Protheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Woraganjanaboon & Anunmana 2024 · Table 2; Figures 4-7
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Vertical enamel wear (um), overall
Monolithic lithium disilicate single-unit crown opposing natural enamel vs Natural enamel opposing natural tooth · 6 to 24 months
SMD -0.45 [-0.71, -0.19]2 studies · 236 participantsGRADE not reported
Vertical enamel wear (um), overall
Monolithic zirconia single-unit crown opposing natural enamel vs Natural enamel opposing natural tooth · 6 to 24 months
SMD -1.32 [-2.06, -0.57]9 studies · 627 participantsGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.