Primary study · included by 1 review
One-piece versus two-piece zirconia abutment supported single implant crown in the esthetic region: 3-Year results from a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.
Lv 2023 · Lv Xiaolei, Pu Yiping, Zhang Xiaomeng, et al. · Clinical oral implants research · 2023
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Bleeding on probing (BoP) Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years | MD 5.18 [-5.92, 16.29] | 5 studies · 178 participants | Very low |
Plaque index (PI) Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years | MD 0.01 [-0.13, 0.14] | 3 studies · 121 participants | Low |
Marginal bone level (MBL) Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years | MD -0.04 [-0.08, -0.001] | 8 studies · 298 participants | Moderate |
Marginal bone level (MBL) change Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years | MD -0.04 [-0.08, -0.00] | NR | GRADE not reported |
Marginal bone level (MBL) change Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years | MD -0.04 [-0.08, -0.00] | NR | GRADE not reported |
Probing depth (PD) Cemented zirconia single crowns vs Screw-retained zirconia single crowns · Follow-up range 0.5 to 10 years | MD 0.03 [-0.16, 0.22] | 5 studies · 178 participants | Moderate |
1 including review in total.