Primary study · included by 2 reviews

Evaluation of a "Picture Assisted Illustration Reinforcement" (PAIR) System for Oral Hygiene in Children with Autism: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Pai Khot 2023 · Pai Khot Atrey J, Choudhury Abhra Roy, Ankola Anil V, et al. · Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023

Included by

Oral Health Interventions in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Interventional Studies.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2025 · cited as Pai Khot 2023 · Table 2; reference list; Figures 5-6
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Plaque index (PI)
Oral health interventions (educational visual, verbal, booklet and procedural approaches; child and/or caregiver directed) vs Control or comparator interventions (e.g., conventional education, manual toothbrush, social story, passive video) · Last post-intervention measurement
SMD -0.73 [-1.02, -0.44]9 studies · 754 participantsLow
Gingival index (GI)
Oral health interventions (educational visual, verbal, booklet and procedural approaches; child and/or caregiver directed) vs Control or comparator interventions (e.g., conventional education, manual toothbrush, social story, passive video) · Last post-intervention measurement
SMD -0.74 [-1.34, -0.14]6 studies · 563 participantsLow
Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S)
Oral health interventions (educational visual, verbal, booklet and procedural approaches; child and/or caregiver directed) vs Control or comparator interventions (e.g., conventional education, manual toothbrush, social story, passive video) · Last post-intervention measurement
SMD -1.386 [-1.843, -0.929]NRLow
Plaque indices combined (PI and OHI-S)
Oral health interventions (educational visual, verbal, booklet/leaflet; procedural) vs Control or comparator (conventional education, other modes, or standard care)
SMD -1.12 [-1.58, -0.65]11 studies · 794 participantsLow
Gingival index (GI)
Oral health interventions (educational visual, verbal, booklet and procedural approaches; child and/or caregiver directed) vs Control or comparator interventions (e.g., conventional education, manual toothbrush, social story, passive video) · Last post-intervention measurement
SMD -0.92 [-1.52, -0.32]5 studies · 503 participantsLow
Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S)
Oral health interventions (educational visual, verbal, booklet and procedural approaches; child and/or caregiver directed) vs Control or comparator interventions (e.g., conventional education, manual toothbrush, social story, passive video) · Last post-intervention measurement
SMD -1.44 [-2.79, -0.08]4 studies · 287 participantsLow
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Oral hygiene practice
Personalized oral health education vs Conventional (regular) oral health education · 6 months
MD 1.14 [0.01, 2.27]1 studyGRADE not reported
Oral hygiene practice
Personalized oral health education vs Conventional (regular) oral health education · All follow-up times (subgroup figure total)
MD 1.01 [0.35, 1.66]1 studyGRADE not reported
Oral hygiene practice
Personalized oral health education vs Conventional (regular) oral health education · All follow-up times pooled (1 to 9 months)
MD 1.51 [0.77, 2.24]2 studies · 912 participantsGRADE not reported
Oral hygiene practice
Personalized oral health education vs Conventional (regular) oral health education · 3 months
MD 0.52 [-1.21, 2.26]1 studyGRADE not reported
Oral hygiene practice
Personalized oral health education vs Conventional (regular) oral health education · 9 months
MD 1.36 [0.41, 2.30]1 studyGRADE not reported

2 including reviews in total.