Primary study · included by 2 reviews
Evaluation of a "Picture Assisted Illustration Reinforcement" (PAIR) System for Oral Hygiene in Children with Autism: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
Pai Khot 2023 · Pai Khot Atrey J, Choudhury Abhra Roy, Ankola Anil V, et al. · Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Plaque index (PI) Oral health interventions (educational visual, verbal, booklet and procedural approaches; child and/or caregiver directed) vs Control or comparator interventions (e.g., conventional education, manual toothbrush, social story, passive video) · Last post-intervention measurement | SMD -0.73 [-1.02, -0.44] | 9 studies · 754 participants | Low |
Gingival index (GI) Oral health interventions (educational visual, verbal, booklet and procedural approaches; child and/or caregiver directed) vs Control or comparator interventions (e.g., conventional education, manual toothbrush, social story, passive video) · Last post-intervention measurement | SMD -0.74 [-1.34, -0.14] | 6 studies · 563 participants | Low |
Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S) Oral health interventions (educational visual, verbal, booklet and procedural approaches; child and/or caregiver directed) vs Control or comparator interventions (e.g., conventional education, manual toothbrush, social story, passive video) · Last post-intervention measurement | SMD -1.386 [-1.843, -0.929] | NR | Low |
Plaque indices combined (PI and OHI-S) Oral health interventions (educational visual, verbal, booklet/leaflet; procedural) vs Control or comparator (conventional education, other modes, or standard care) | SMD -1.12 [-1.58, -0.65] | 11 studies · 794 participants | Low |
Gingival index (GI) Oral health interventions (educational visual, verbal, booklet and procedural approaches; child and/or caregiver directed) vs Control or comparator interventions (e.g., conventional education, manual toothbrush, social story, passive video) · Last post-intervention measurement | SMD -0.92 [-1.52, -0.32] | 5 studies · 503 participants | Low |
Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S) Oral health interventions (educational visual, verbal, booklet and procedural approaches; child and/or caregiver directed) vs Control or comparator interventions (e.g., conventional education, manual toothbrush, social story, passive video) · Last post-intervention measurement | SMD -1.44 [-2.79, -0.08] | 4 studies · 287 participants | Low |
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Oral hygiene practice Personalized oral health education vs Conventional (regular) oral health education · 6 months | MD 1.14 [0.01, 2.27] | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Oral hygiene practice Personalized oral health education vs Conventional (regular) oral health education · All follow-up times (subgroup figure total) | MD 1.01 [0.35, 1.66] | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Oral hygiene practice Personalized oral health education vs Conventional (regular) oral health education · All follow-up times pooled (1 to 9 months) | MD 1.51 [0.77, 2.24] | 2 studies · 912 participants | GRADE not reported |
Oral hygiene practice Personalized oral health education vs Conventional (regular) oral health education · 3 months | MD 0.52 [-1.21, 2.26] | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Oral hygiene practice Personalized oral health education vs Conventional (regular) oral health education · 9 months | MD 1.36 [0.41, 2.30] | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
2 including reviews in total.