Primary study · included by 1 review

Meat Intake and the Risk of Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

Yu 2023 · Yu Jinchuan, Li Haigui, Liu Zhengxiang, et al. · Nutrition and cancer · 2023

Included by

Bladder cancer risk factors: a comprehensive umbrella review of meta-analyses.

Non-Cochrane · aetiology · 2026 · cited as Yu 2023 · Table 1 (Included MA); References

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Risk of bladder cancer Higher total meat vs Lower total meat	RR 1.10 [0.92, 1.31]	11 studies · 137163 participants	Very low
Risk of bladder cancer Higher fish vs Lower fish	RR 0.80 [0.67, 0.95]	15 studies · 363935 participants	Very low
Risk of bladder cancer Higher processed meat vs Lower processed meat	RR 1.16 [1.08, 1.25]	19 studies · 772304 participants	Low
Risk of bladder cancer Higher total meat vs Lower total meat	RR 1.27	NR	GRADE not reported
Risk of bladder cancer Higher red meat intake vs Lower red meat intake	RR 1.47	NR	GRADE not reported
Risk of bladder cancer Higher fish vs Lower fish	RR 0.60	NR	GRADE not reported
Risk of bladder cancer Higher total meat vs Lower total meat	RR 1.31	NR	GRADE not reported
Risk of bladder cancer Higher red meat intake vs Lower red meat intake	RR 1.26	NR	GRADE not reported
Risk of bladder cancer Higher red meat intake vs Lower red meat intake	RR 1.31	NR	GRADE not reported
Risk of bladder cancer Higher white meat vs Lower white meat	RR 0.96 [0.83, 1.10]	15 studies · 758212 participants	Very low
Risk of bladder cancer Higher processed meat vs Lower processed meat	RR 1.39	NR	GRADE not reported
Risk of bladder cancer Higher red meat intake vs Lower red meat intake	RR 1.23 [1.08, 1.39]	20 studies · 1267801 participants	Very low
Risk of bladder cancer Higher white meat vs Lower white meat	RR 0.75	NR	GRADE not reported

1 including review in total.