Primary study · included by 2 reviews

Outcome of root canal treatment using warm vertical compaction with bioceramic and resin-based sealers: A randomised clinical trial.

Hu 2023 · Hu Jinghao, Zhu Yunjie, Deng Shuli, et al. · Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc · 2023

Included by

Effect of root canal filling techniques and materials on endodontic treatment outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Hu 2023 · Table 2; reference 27

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

Efficacy of Bioceramic Cements Versus Conventional Cements in the Prognosis of Endodontic Treatments in Patients with Apical Periodontitis: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Hu 2023 · Tables 2 and 3; Meta-analysis results; Figure 3

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Periapical healing (healing success) Bioceramic sealers (e.g., BioRoot RCS, iRoot SP, Meta CeraSeal) vs Conventional sealers (AH Plus, zinc oxide-eugenol, calcium hydroxide-based) · 6 to 12 months follow-up	RR 1.05 [0.89, 1.23]	4 studies · 199 participants	GRADE not reported
Periapical healing (healing success) Bioceramic sealers (e.g., BioRoot RCS, iRoot SP, Meta CeraSeal) vs Conventional sealers (AH Plus, zinc oxide-eugenol, calcium hydroxide-based) · 6 to 12 months follow-up	RR 0.995 [0.875, 1.132]	6 studies	GRADE not reported
Periapical healing (healing success) Bioceramic sealers (e.g., BioRoot RCS, iRoot SP, Meta CeraSeal) vs Conventional sealers (AH Plus, zinc oxide-eugenol, calcium hydroxide-based) · 6 to 12 months follow-up	RR 1.08 [0.94, 1.24]	4 studies · 199 participants	GRADE not reported

2 including reviews in total.