evidencegaps
Primary study · included by 1 review

Three-Dimensional Comparison of the Maxillary Surfaces through ICP-Type Algorithm: Accuracy Evaluation of CAD/CAM Technologies in Orthognathic Surgery.

Cassoni 2022 · Cassoni Andrea, Manganiello Luigi, Barbera Giorgio, et al. · International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022

Included by

Patient-specific guides and osteosynthesis versus CAD/CAM occlusal splints in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of accuracy, operative time, and complications.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Cassoni 2022 · Table 1; Fig. 2-7; reference list [23]
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Combined three-dimensional linear deviation (mm), supportive summary
Patient-specific implant (PSI) workflows (cutting/drilling guides and/or customized osteosynthesis plates) vs CAD/CAM occlusal splint or wafer workflows · Within 3 days to 1 month postoperative
MD -0.51 [-0.70, -0.33]14 studiesGRADE not reported
Combined three-dimensional linear deviation (mm), supportive summary
Patient-specific implant (PSI) workflows (cutting/drilling guides and/or customized osteosynthesis plates) vs CAD/CAM occlusal splint or wafer workflows · Within 3 days to 1 month postoperative
MD -0.46 [-0.66, -0.25]9 studiesGRADE not reported
Combined three-dimensional linear deviation (mm), supportive summary
Patient-specific implant (PSI) workflows (cutting/drilling guides and/or customized osteosynthesis plates) vs CAD/CAM occlusal splint or wafer workflows · Within 3 days to 1 month postoperative
MD -0.56 [-0.92, -0.19]9 studiesGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.